Politicians the world around spend their time scheming ways to separate their constituents from their money.
Anyone involved in online marketing we should be aware that states cannot force an online merchant to collect sales tax unless the merchant has a physical presence within the state. Of course, the states are very upset because the residents still have a bit of money in their pockets and the politicians hadn’t been able to get their hands on it.
Colorado came up with a new scheme. The state has a use tax and wanted the online merchant to report the purchases to the state, thereby helping the state chase down the miscreant citizens. But, a Federal Judge ruled that the Colorado law was unconstitutional.
Colorado’s reporting law “imposes a differential burden on out-of-state retailers because the different burden is imposed precisely because the retailer is an out-of-state retailer” who is exempted by the Supreme Court from paying sales tax in Colorado, Blackburn wrote. “Only a change in the law by the Supreme Court or action by Congress can change the situation” and allow states to reach out-of-state retailers, he concluded.
Read more: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/04/judge-spares-amazon-from-colorado-sales-tax-reporting-scheme.ars?clicked=related_right
The ATT business model must be based on the concept of over promise and under deliver.
ATT has an “unlimited” data plan for its customers but warns them that it’s unlimited only until they reach their limit.
When ATT customers on the “unlimited” data plan use too much data they suddenly find their download speeds slow to a crawl.
The new rates apply to about 17 million customers, mainly those that download a lot of videos or music. As you can well expect, the customers are not happy.
Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203986604577255532947217336.html?mod=rss_Technology&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_med
Motley Fool thinks Pinterest could knock FaceBook off its perch.
When a better technology comes along, there is little cost for a consumer to switch – as they did, for example, from Yahoo! to Google around 2003. While Google+ was seen as the biggest threat to Facebook because of Google’s size and built-in user base, Pinterest demonstrates that a small player might be what Facebook should fear instead.
They don’t like Facebook as an investment.
Read more: http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/03/02/why-one-website-kills-facebooks-future.aspx
Google Inc. will allow a “do-not- track” button to be embedded in its Web browser, letting users restrict the amount of data that can be collected about them.
Read more: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-23/google-agrees-to-allow-do-not-track-button-in-browser.html
Think how nice it is to have an unlimited cellular data plan. All the major carriers have such a plan. But the ATT unlimited data plan works well – until you use it.
Once ATT decides you have become one of the heaviest users, i.e. the top 5% of data users, ATT will throttle their speed by as much as 99%. It would make the smart phone essentially useless.
ATT wants to push users toward using WIFI instead of cellular.
It must mean that ATT is adopting that old business maxim, “over promise. under deliver.
Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TEC_ATT_DATA_SLOWDOWN?SITE=NYPLA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
This one surprised me. I never would have expected Facebook to be among the most hated companies. A few others surprised me too.
Check it out: http://247wallst.com/2012/01/13/the-10-most-hated-companies-in-america/